Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...
" />
Published On: Tue, Oct 23rd, 2018

Supreme Court sets aside appeal court’s decision on Rivers APC congresses

Share This
Tags

By Vivian Okejeme Abuja

The Supreme Court yesterday, dismissed the decision of the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt Division, that gave a nod to the conduct of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Congresses in Rivers State.
Setting aside the decision of the Appeal Court of June 21, 2018 against the ruling of a Rivers State High Court, the Apex court held that the appellate court acted in bad faith.
Delivering the judgement in an appeal filed by one Abdulahi Umar, Justice Centus Chima Nweze, held that the Court of Appeal ought not to have vacated the injunctive order issued against the APC by the Rivers State High Court on the conduct of the congresses.
Justice A. C. Nwosu, of the Rivers State High Court had in an exparte motion filed by Umar restrained the APC from conducting the congresses pending the determination of the suit instituted by Umar, complaining against his marginalization and 22 others in the said congresses.
But while the injunctive order of the High Court was subsisting, the APC went ahead and conducted the ward, local government and state congresses on May 19, 20 and 21.
After the conduct of the congresses, the court of Appeal in a ruling on an application by APC seeking stay of execution of the High Court injunctive order and stay of proceedings of the main suit, vacated the injunctive order and refused to stay hearing of the substantive matter.
Aggrieved by the decision of the Appellate court, Umar approached the Supreme Court for redress.
In the judgment, the Supreme Court berated the Appeal Court for judicially indulging APC and vacating the injunctive order in the party’s favour when there is abundant evidence that the APC was in contempt of court.
Further in its ruling the Apex court held that the Court of Appeal ought not to have granted its discretion in favour of APC because the party was in grave violation of the order of the High Court.
The court maintained that the Appeal Court has a duty to protect a lawful subsisting order and ought not to have granted favourable judicial discretion for a party that willingly disobeyed valid court order.
“It is unfortunate and wrongful for the Court of Appeal to have entertained a party in contempt of a valid court order to the extent of granting judicial favour by way of staying of execution of an injunctive order when the party at the center of the dispute was in gross contempt of court.
“It is a serious matter for anyone to flout a court order and in the instant case, it is clear that the respondent (APC) was in grave disobedience to 2 lawful court orders”, the court held.
“it is sacrilegious, illfated and suicide mission for the court of Appeal to have departed from various decision of the Supreme Court that any party in contempt of court ought not to be granted judicial discretion and in this matter Appeal Court is bound to follow Supreme Court final decision.”
He said, what is more, refusal of the Court of Appeal to be bound by final decision of Supreme Court is a gross insubordination.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

%d bloggers like this: