Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...
" />
Published On: Wed, Nov 14th, 2018

Ogboru, INEC oppose suit challenging Delta APC guber congress

Share This
Tags

By Vivian Okejeme Abuja

The governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress(APC) in Delta State, Chief Great Ogboru, and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) have opposed a suit, challenging the outcome of the party gubernatorial primaries held on 30th September 2018.
The plaintiff, Hon. Victor Ochei, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1085/2018, mentioned INEC, APC and Great Ogboru as First, second and third defendants respectively.
When the matter came up yesterday, Counsel to INEC, Ebuka Nwaeze, urged Justice Nnamdi Dimgba to strike out the matter, adding that the court has no jurisdiction to hear the case.
Nwaeze stated that jurisdiction conferred to the court as it relates to prepare election matters is on non compliance to party constitution, electoral act, and 1999 constitution.
He further argued that the court does not have jurisdiction to determine whether the matter as presently constituted.
In the same vern, counsel to the third defendant(Ogboru) Nelson Imoh objected to Ochei’s suit, according to him, it was not initiated by due process.
Also he insisted that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the case as constituted.
Arguing further, Imoh, submitted that the procedure for the enforcement of an extant judgment of court in an event of an alleged disobedience therefore is as provided for under Section 66 (f); Section 72 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act; Order ix Rules (13) (1) & (2) of the Judgment (Enforcement) Rules made pursuant to the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act.
He maintained that the consent judgment of Hon Justice A. I Chikere delivered on the 19th of June, 2018, is an existing judgment that has not been appealed against nor set aside.
He therefore, held that the present court is a court of coordinate jurisdiction and at par with the court of Hon Justice A.l. Chikere.
“This court has no jurisdiction to add to, extend, remove from, substitute and or expand the content, purview, tenor and the application of the consent judgment of Hon Justice A.| Chikere delivered on the 19th day of June, 2018.
“The Governorship primaries of the second defendant that produced the third defendant/applicant as the flag bearer of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in the 2019 Governorship Election in Delta state was conducted in substantial compliance with Section 87 (4) (b) of the Electoral Act 2010 (As amended).
“There is no material placed before this court by the pIaintiff/respondent to show that a particular section of the Electoral Act was breached by the third defendant with regards to the Governorship primaries of the second defendant that produced the third defendant/applicant as the flag bearer of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in the 2019 Governorship Election in Delta State.
More so, Ogboru’s counsel contended that the consent judgment of Justice A.l Chikere delivered on the 19day of June, 2018, has no name of a particular delegate to be duse for the conduct of the Governorship primaries of the APC in Delta state.
The third defendant stated that all the reliefs as contained in the pIaintiff/respondent’s Originating Summons were reliefs not founded on law nor capable of sustaining the Originating Summons.
He pointed out that Articles 7 & 20 of the All Progressive Congress (APC) constitution 2012 (as amended) was substantially and wholly complied with by the third defendant/applicant, as well as first and second defendants in the conduct of the Governorship primaries of the APC that produced the Ogboru as the flag bearer of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in the 2019 Governorship Election in Delta state.
In addition, he said the case of Victor Ochei was brought in bad faith, stressing “There is no reasonable cause of action disclosed against the third defendant\applicant in the plaintiff‘s Originating Summons.
“The pIaintiff/respondent who participated fully in the said primaries of the 30th of September, 2018 of the second defendant, had delegates’ votes counted and assigned to him by the Delta State Governorship primaries Chairman assigned by the second defendant’s National Executive Council, cannot turn around to complain of non-compliance with the conduct of the said Governorship primaries in Delta state.
“Issues of disputed facts in contention are not maintainable by way of an Originating Summons.
“The case of the plaintiff is speculative and an arrant abuse of the process of this honourable court.”

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

%d bloggers like this: